Crisis IT Support Recovery Through AI Innovation

Client: Small Professional Association (~50 employees)
Industry: Healthcare Professional Services
Timeline: 4 weeks emergency deployment

---

The Results: From Crisis to Efficiency

• 75% reduction in helpdesk support time required

• 20+ hours per week reduced to 5 hours per week

• Emergency IT continuity restored in 4 weeks

• 5 years of knowledge recovered and made instantly accessible

• Self-improving support system that gets smarter with each ticket

---

The Crisis

A small professional association faced an operational emergency: their entire 7-person IT team had resigned within a month after management brought in an outside consulting firm without the IT director's knowledge.

The organization was left with no internal IT support capability for 50 employees who depended on complex technology systems for daily operations.

Immediate Problems:

• Zero internal IT expertise remaining

• Outside consulting firm spending 20+ hours per week just on helpdesk tickets

• No efficient way to resolve basic IT issues

• Five years of institutional knowledge thought gone

• Ticket resolution taking hours of research for each request

• No systematic approach to leveraging existing solutions

The challenge: Restore basic IT functionality without rebuilding an entire internal team or continuing the expensive consulting arrangement.

---

Our Approach: AI-Powered Knowledge Recovery

Rather than hiring expensive technical staff, Wexford deployed an innovative AI solution to unlock the organization's existing knowledge assets.

Phase 1: Knowledge Archaeology

We extracted and analyzed the organization's complete IT support history:

• Scraped 5 years of Salesforce helpdesk tickets

• Systematically scrubbed all personally identifiable information

• Categorized common issues and resolution patterns

• Identified recurring problems and standard solutions

Critical Insight

The knowledge needed to solve current problems already existed; it was just inaccessible. Previous IT staff had documented solutions to virtually every issue, but finding relevant information required hours of manual searching.

Phase 2: AI Implementation

We deployed Google NotebookLM as the knowledge platform:

• Fed the entire scrubbed ticket history into the AI system

• Trained the system on organizational-specific solutions and configurations

• Created query protocols for rapid issue identification and resolution

• Established citation systems linking AI responses to original ticket solutions

Phase 3: Process Redesign

We streamlined the entire support workflow:

• Migrated consulting firm's process into existing Salesforce ticketing

• Eliminated helpdesk as middleware—users communicate directly with support

• Required all communication within Salesforce for transparency and knowledge capture

• Created single source of truth for all IT support interactions

Strategic Organizational Benefits

Beyond the immediate 75% efficiency gain, the transformation delivered lasting value:

---

Operational Recovery

• Restored IT continuity without hiring full-time staff

• Leveraged existing assets rather than starting from scratch

• Ticket resolution time: Reduced from hours to minutes

• Process efficiency: Eliminated multiple handoffs and communication gaps

Knowledge Preservation

• Every new ticket now contributes to AI training data

• Created sustainable support model that improves with each interaction

• Established transparency in all support communications

• Self-improving system that gets smarter over time

Process Innovation

Before: Multiple communication channels, lost context, repeated research
After: All communication in Salesforce, searchable history, AI-assisted resolution

---

Innovation Insights

AI as Knowledge Amplifier
The most powerful AI applications don't replace human expertise—they make existing knowledge more accessible and actionable.

Crisis as Catalyst
Emergency situations often reveal opportunities for dramatic process improvements that would be difficult to implement under normal circumstances.

Historical Data as Competitive Advantage
Organizations often undervalue their historical data. Properly leveraged, years of operational history become powerful AI training assets.

---

The Wexford Difference

This engagement demonstrates our approach to crisis consulting:

We turn emergencies into opportunities. While other consultants might have recommended expensive staff replacement, we leveraged existing assets to create superior capabilities.

We deploy cutting-edge solutions rapidly. Our AI implementation delivered results in 4 weeks while building sustainable long-term value.

We design solutions that improve over time. Each support interaction makes the system smarter, creating compound value from our initial intervention.

We operate under your brand, protecting your client relationships. The technology consultant maintained full ownership of the AI transformation initiative while we handled the complex implementation work. They were able to deliver cutting-edge knowledge management services to their client without diverting resources from their core strategic work - and get compensated for the full engagement while we operated invisibly under their brand.

---

Ready for White Label AI-Powered Operations?

Crisis or opportunity, your organization's historical knowledge is a powerful asset waiting to be unlocked. Let Wexford show you how AI can transform operational challenges into competitive advantages.

Facing an IT crisis or looking to optimize support?
Contact us to discuss how AI can amplify your organizational knowledge.

This case study represents actual client work. Specific details have been anonymized to protect the confidentiality of our white label agreement while illustrating representative outcomes and methodologies.

---

White-Label Platform Optimization & Cost Recovery

Client: Mid-sized Professional Association
Industry: Healthcare Professional Services
Timeline: 12 weeks behind-the-scenes execution

The Results: Strategic Vision Delivered

• 60% platform cost reduction identified and roadmapped

• 32% immediate license savings through inactive user cleanup

• 1,400+ forms audited and optimization plan delivered

• Complete documentation standardization across all departments

• Fractional CIO's strategic recommendations successfully executed

• All credit maintained with strategic leadership

---

The Challenge

A fractional CIO had identified platform sprawl as a major cost drain consuming 30%+ of the technology budget unnecessarily. They needed detailed execution support to turn their strategic recommendation into measurable savings without compromising their leadership positioning.

The organization was facing classic scaling problems:

Immediate Cost Drains:

• 1,400+ forms across a single platform with no governance

• 32% of paid user licenses completely inactive

• Multiple platforms serving overlapping functions

• No strategic framework for technology decision-making

Operational Risks:

• Critical processes undocumented and vulnerable to staff changes

• Business continuity risks from knowledge concentration

• Documentation scattered and inconsistent across departments

• Zero standards for ongoing platform management

The fractional CIO needed execution partners who could deliver the complex audit and optimization work while ensuring all strategic credit flowed back to their leadership.

---

Our Approach: White-Label Execution Excellence

Working entirely behind the scenes, Wexford executed the detailed implementation of the CIO's strategic vision. Our role was to make their recommendations successful while remaining completely invisible to the organization.

Phase 1: Platform Audit Execution

We delivered the comprehensive analysis the CIO had recommended:

• Audited all 1,393 forms across the primary platform

• Analyzed 53 user accounts for actual usage vs. license costs

• Identified critical business dependencies and integration points

• Mapped business continuity risks the CIO had identified as priorities

Critical Discovery (Behind the Scenes)

One inactive user owned 45 business-critical forms including systems used daily. This represented the exact type of risk the CIO had warned leadership about - we documented it for their strategic presentation.

Phase 2: Documentation Standardization

We executed the operational improvements the CIO had outlined:

• Created comprehensive style guide establishing organizational standards

• Redesigned 23 critical procedures with consistent governance structure

• Implemented AI-ready file organization for future technology adoption

• Established sustainable review cycles with clear ownership protocols

Phase 3: Strategic Framework Implementation

We built the scalable systems the CIO had envisioned:

• Designed department-specific process templates for ongoing standardization

• Built tracking systems for measuring improvement progress

• Established governance protocols preventing future platform sprawl

• Created technology evaluation criteria supporting strategic decision-making

Throughout the engagement, all communication flowed through the CIO to maintain their strategic ownership and leadership positioning.

---

Strategic Value Delivered (Behind the Scenes)

Immediate Cost Optimization

• 60% platform storage reduction through strategic cleanup execution

• 30% user license cost savings via inactive account removal

• Redundant feature elimination based on utilization analysis

• Clear roadmap for ongoing cost management

Risk Mitigation Implementation

• Business continuity risks documented and resolved

• Knowledge preservation protocols established before staff transitions

• Vendor dependency mapping completed for strategic negotiations

Operational Excellence Framework

• Documentation standards implemented across all departments

• Scalable governance structure designed for continued growth

• AI-ready infrastructure positioned for future technology adoption

White-Label Partnership Success

The fractional CIO was able to present comprehensive results to leadership as the successful execution of their strategic vision:

Leadership Presentation Impact:

• Cost reduction roadmap delivered exactly as the CIO had promised

• Operational risk mitigation demonstrated strategic foresight

• Scalable governance framework showed long-term thinking

Ongoing Strategic Credibility:

• Technology decisions now supported by systematic evaluation criteria

• Documentation standards prevent future operational chaos

• Platform optimization becomes ongoing competitive advantage

---

The Wexford Difference: Invisible Excellence

This engagement demonstrates our white-label execution approach:

We don't compete for credit - we make our partners look brilliant. The fractional CIO maintained full ownership of the strategic vision while we handled complex execution work behind the scenes.

We deliver strategic recommendations, not strategic competition. Our analysis and optimization work amplified the CIO's leadership rather than undermining it.

We design solutions that enhance partner credibility. Every deliverable reinforced the CIO's strategic expertise while providing measurable business value.

Your strategy, our execution. The client received the strategic leadership they hired while getting world-class implementation support they didn't know they needed.

We operate under your brand, protecting your client relationships. The fractional CIO maintained full ownership of the cost optimization initiative while we handled the complex analysis and implementation work. They were able to deliver comprehensive platform efficiency services without diverting focus from strategic technology leadership - and get compensated for the full engagement while we operated invisibly under their brand.

---

Ready for White-Label Partnership?

Platform sprawl and operational inefficiency undermine strategic leadership credibility. Let Wexford execute your technology optimization recommendations while you maintain full strategic ownership and client relationships.

Need execution support for your strategic initiatives?
Contact us to discuss how white-label partnership can amplify your client success.

This case study represents actual client work completed under white-label partnership. Specific details have been anonymized to protect confidentiality while illustrating representative outcomes and methodologies.

Strategic Technology Selection & Vendor Evaluation

Client: Mid-sized Professional Association
Industry: Healthcare Professional Services
Timeline: 6 months

---

The Results: Comprehensive Selection Process

• Complete technology evaluation from requirements to vendor selection

• 8 major deliverables produced on schedule across 6 months

• 3 vendor demos with structured evaluation framework

• 4 reference calls conducted with detailed assessment

• Side-by-side vendor comparison supporting final decision

• Reusable evaluation frameworks created for future technology decisions

The Challenge

A management consulting firm working with a growing professional association had identified the need for technology modernization as part of their strategic roadmap. They needed execution partners to deliver the complex vendor selection process while maintaining their strategic client relationship and focus.

The organization required a structured vendor evaluation process but lacked internal expertise to manage the complex requirements gathering, RFP development, and vendor assessment cycle.

Core Requirements:

• Comprehensive requirements analysis across 8 functional areas

• Professional RFP development and vendor management

• Structured evaluation process with demos, references, and deep dives

• Objective vendor comparison supporting strategic decision-making

• Timeline management over 6-month selection cycle

The challenge: Execute a professional technology selection process without internal project management resources or vendor evaluation expertise.

---

Our Approach: Structured Technology Selection

We delivered a comprehensive vendor evaluation process with consistent monthly deliverables and clear decision-making frameworks.

Phase 1: Requirements Development

Project initiation and knowledge transfer completed: 1 week
Detailed functional requirements matrix covering:

• General system requirements and architecture

• Certification and CPD management

• Events management and registration

• Reporting and analytics capabilities

• Committee management workflows

• Finance and accounting integration

• Membership management and CRM functionality

Requirements were reviewed, validated, and prioritized with stakeholder input.

Phase 2: RFP Development and Distribution

Drafted and packaged comprehensive RFP document incorporating the requirements matrix. Document distributed to qualified vendors with structured timeline.

Clear communication protocols established for vendor management throughout the process.

Phase 3: Evaluation Framework Development

During vendor proposal development period, we created structured evaluation tools:

• Detailed demo use cases aligned with organizational workflows

• Structured evaluation scorecards for objective vendor comparison

• Reference call frameworks for systematic vendor validation

• Deep dive session agendas for comprehensive technical assessment

Phase 4: Vendor Assessment Execution

Conducted three vendor demonstrations using structured demo scripts and evaluation scorecards. Completed debrief sessions with client team following each demonstration.

Facilitated four vendor reference calls using structured interview frameworks to validate vendor claims and assess client satisfaction.

Delivered deep dive session agendas, vendor-specific use cases, and structured note capture tools for comprehensive technical evaluation.

Deep dive sessions conducted with top two vendors. Proactive communication was maintained regarding scheduling conflicts while ensuring process continuity.

Phase 5: Decision Support and Contract Preparation

Delivered comprehensive side-by-side vendor comparison incorporating:

• RFP response analysis

• Demo performance assessment

• Reference call feedback

• Deep dive technical evaluation

• Cost-benefit analysis

Client selected based on structured evaluation framework.

Developed Best and Final Offer (BAFO) request incorporating client priorities and negotiation strategy.

---

Strategic Organizational Benefits

Process Excellence

• Systematic vendor evaluation eliminated bias and ensured comprehensive assessment

• Consistent monthly deliverables maintained project momentum and stakeholder engagement

• Structured decision framework provided clear rationale for technology selection

• Professional vendor management enhanced organizational credibility throughout process

Knowledge Transfer and Reusability

• Comprehensive requirements matrix serves as blueprint for future technology decisions

• Evaluation frameworks and scorecards can be adapted for other vendor selections

• Demo scripts and use cases provide templates for ongoing technology assessment

• Process documentation enables internal team to replicate methodology

Risk Mitigation

• Thorough vendor validation through references and deep dives reduced implementation risk

• Structured comparison methodology ensured objective decision-making

• Contract negotiation preparation positioned client for favorable terms

• Integration assessment recommendations identified potential implementation challenges

---

Implementation Readiness Assessment

Immediate Next Steps Identified:

• BAFO response evaluation framework

• Contract negotiation strategy with competitive leverage

• Integration scope analysis for third-party applications

• Implementation planning and project management framework

Strategic Recommendations Delivered:

• Cross-walk evaluation methodology for certification and CPD functionality

• Integration dependency mapping for vendor timeline validation

• Ongoing vendor relationship management protocols

• Technology governance framework for future decisions

---

Key Success Factors

Systematic Methodology Over Ad Hoc Evaluation
Rather than informal vendor meetings, we designed structured evaluation processes that enabled objective comparison and defensible decision-making.

Consistent Project Momentum
Monthly deliverables maintained forward progress while allowing for thorough evaluation at each stage of the selection process.

Reusable Framework Development
Every tool and template created for this engagement can be leveraged for future technology decisions, amplifying the long-term value of the investment.

---

The Wexford Difference

This engagement demonstrates our approach to complex technology selection:

We deliver systematic processes, not subjective opinions. Our structured methodology enables objective vendor evaluation and defensible decision-making.

We create reusable assets, not one-time solutions. The frameworks and templates developed for this engagement provide ongoing value for future technology decisions.

We maintain professional vendor relationships throughout the process. Our approach enhances organizational credibility while ensuring thorough evaluation of all options.

We operate under your brand, protecting your client relationships. The consulting firm maintained full ownership of the strategic initiative while we handled the complex execution work. They were able to deliver comprehensive technology selection services to their client without diverting resources from their core strategic work - and get compensated for the full engagement while we operated invisibly under their brand.

---

Ready for Professional Technology Selection?

Complex technology decisions require systematic evaluation processes that most organizations lack internal expertise to manage effectively. Let Wexford deliver the structured vendor selection methodology that ensures optimal technology investments.

Facing a complex technology selection decision?
Contact us to discuss how systematic vendor evaluation can optimize your technology investments.

---

This case study represents actual client work. Specific details have been anonymized to protect confidentiality while illustrating representative outcomes and methodologies.

Multi-Initiative Technology Portfolio Management

Client: Regional Technology Development Organization
Industry: Economic Development / Government Technology
Timeline: 6 months

---

The Results: Portfolio-Wide Progress

• 8 concurrent technology initiatives managed and advanced

• 100% on-time delivery for all scheduled milestones

• Critical governance gaps identified and escalated to leadership

• Flagship program successfully launched with live intake and reporting

• Cross-program collaboration established between various internal initiatives

• Risk mitigation achieved through proactive escalation of web redesign security concerns

---

The Challenge

A management consulting firm working with a technology-focused organization was struggling to support their client's multiple stalled technology initiatives across different departments. The consulting firm needed comprehensive execution support to advance their client's technology portfolio while maintaining their strategic advisory role and client relationship focus.

The organization faced several critical challenges that the consulting firm had identified but lacked bandwidth to execute:

Portfolio Management Complexity:

• 8 different technology initiatives requiring simultaneous coordination

• Multiple stakeholder groups across programs with competing priorities

• Governance gaps preventing approval and advancement of key frameworks

• Resource allocation challenges across concurrent projects

Organizational Alignment Issues:

• Lack of steering committee for strategic technology decisions

• Disconnected systems requiring integration and standardization

• Cross-departmental coordination needs for reporting and compliance

• Technology platform evaluation requiring objective analysis

The challenge: Execute comprehensive technology portfolio management while allowing leadership to focus on strategic economic development initiatives and organizational growth.

---

Our Approach: Comprehensive Portfolio Execution

We managed several technology initiatives simultaneously while identifying and escalating systemic organizational issues that were blocking progress.

Portfolio Management Strategy

Concurrent Initiative Management: Rather than sequential project execution, we coordinated 8 different technology workstreams with varying timelines, stakeholders, and dependencies.

Proactive Risk Identification: Throughout all initiatives, we identified governance gaps, resource constraints, and strategic alignment issues that required leadership attention.

Stakeholder Coordination: We maintained communication across multiple program areas.

---

Initiative Execution Results

IT Intake, Triage & Prioritization Framework

• Delivered: Project charter, routing logic, and revised SharePoint intake form fields

• Timeline: 4 weeks

• Impact: Established structured, repeatable process for IT request management

• Barrier Identified: Progress stalled due to missing Steering Committee governance structure

Touches & Impact Reporting

• Delivered: Cross-organizational reporting project charter with stakeholder feedback integration

• Timeline: 2 weeks

• Impact: Created framework for compliance reporting and organizational impact storytelling

• Barrier Identified: Approval process blocked by governance gap

Platform Enhancement

• Delivered: User personas, use cases, UAT completion, and Release 2.0 requirements

• Timeline: 4 weeks

• Impact: Improved user experience and positioned platform for continuous enhancement

• Success Factor: Consistent weekly stakeholder sessions maintained momentum

Program Implementation

• Delivered: Program charter, requirements documentation, live intake form, reporting framework, and cross-program collaboration initiation

• Timeline: 6 weeks

• Impact: Established platform as central compliance and collaboration hub

• Success Factor: Weekly working sessions with key stakeholders ensured consistent progress

Enterprise Platform Evaluation

• Delivered: Comprehensive comparative analysis of enterprise platforms

• Timeline: 16 weeks

• Impact: Provided objective evaluation framework for major technology decisions

• Strategic Insight: Identified risks of making large-scale technology decisions without full stakeholder engagement

Dashboard Review and Accessibility Assessment

• Delivered: Comprehensive review with accessibility and UI recommendations

• Timeline: 3 weeks

• Impact: Identified critical accessibility gaps and brand risk mitigation needs

• Follow-up: Recommendations positioned for future implementation cycles

User Access Analysis

• Delivered: Root cause analysis and resource scoping for access configuration issues

• Timeline: 5 weeks

• Impact: Provided leadership with clear understanding of systemic access issues and resolution requirements

• Strategic Insight: Highlighted need for technology platform decision before major system modifications

Web Redesign Risk Escalation

• Delivered: Risk assessment and security considerations for vendor selection process

• Timeline: 1 week

• Impact: Prevented potential security and integration gaps in vendor selection

• Proactive Value: Ensured executive awareness before final vendor decisions

---

Strategic Organizational Benefits

Governance Framework Recognition

Through portfolio management, we identified critical organizational needs:

• Steering Committee requirement for technology decision-making

• Cross-departmental coordination gaps affecting project advancement

• Resource allocation challenges requiring executive attention

Risk Mitigation and Proactive Management

• Security risk prevention through early escalation of web redesign concerns

• Technology platform decision framework preventing costly mistakes

• Accessibility compliance identification protecting brand reputation

Sustainable Progress Systems

• Weekly working sessions established for flagship programs

• Backlog management processes implemented for ongoing enhancement

• Cross-program collaboration initiated for organizational efficiency

---

Implementation Readiness Assessment

Immediate Success Factors:

• Program momentum maintained through consistent stakeholder engagement

• Platform enhancement pipeline established with clear development cycles

• Risk escalation protocols proven effective for organizational protection

Governance Requirements for Continued Success:

• Steering Committee formation essential for unblocking stalled initiatives

• Cross-departmental requirements gathering needed for platform decisions

• Project management assignment required for Release 2.0 advancement

---

Key Success Factors

Portfolio Coordination Over Single-Project Focus
Managing 8 concurrent initiatives revealed systemic organizational issues that single-project approaches would have missed.

Proactive Risk Identification and Escalation
Rather than just executing assigned tasks, we identified and escalated organizational gaps that were blocking strategic progress.

Stakeholder Engagement Consistency
Regular working sessions and communication protocols maintained momentum across multiple complex initiatives simultaneously.

Strategic Insight Integration
Portfolio management perspective enabled identification of technology decision frameworks that single-project execution would not have revealed.

---

The Wexford Difference

This engagement demonstrates our approach to comprehensive technology portfolio management:

We manage complexity, not just individual projects. Our portfolio perspective reveals systemic issues and strategic opportunities that single-initiative approaches miss.

We identify organizational gaps, not just technical solutions. Through comprehensive execution, we surface governance and process issues that require leadership attention.

We maintain momentum across multiple workstreams simultaneously. Our project coordination ensures consistent progress while leadership focuses on strategic organizational development.

We operate under your brand, protecting your client relationships. Consulting firm maintained full ownership of all technology initiatives while we handled the complex execution work across multiple programs. They were able to demonstrate comprehensive technology leadership to stakeholders without diverting resources from economic development strategy - and maintain credit for all successful outcomes while we operated invisibly across their technology portfolio.

---

Ready for Portfolio-Level Technology Management?

Complex organizations need comprehensive technology execution across multiple initiatives simultaneously. Let Wexford manage your technology portfolio while you maintain focus on strategic organizational objectives.

Managing multiple technology initiatives without internal coordination capacity?
Contact us to discuss how portfolio-level execution management can advance your strategic technology objectives.

---

This case study represents actual client work. Specific details have been anonymized to protect confidentiality while illustrating representative outcomes and methodologies.